Latest Entries »

 

The cold weather has seen gas demand soar across Europe
The cold weather has seen gas demand soar across Europe

The price of gas around Europe has risen sharply due to increased demand as a result of the cold weather.

UK gas for next day delivery reached 93 pence per therm, the highest for more than six years.

It marks a rise of 24% in the UK price since Friday.

In addition, Italy has decided to ration the supply of gas to industrial customers after receiving insufficient gas from Russia to meet high levels of demand.

Prices have soared even higher in France, which is struggling to meet demand, reaching the equivalent of almost £1.02 per therm.

Companies supplying residential customers rarely buy gas on the next day market. But it is relied upon by some big commercial users.

Jeremy Nicholson, of the UK Energy Intensive Users Group said: “This is a pretty savage price hike for large-scale users of gas.

“A very large proportion of major industrial gas users pay for their supply on a next-day basis, so these price hikes will filter through much more quickly to them.

Like so much of Europe, Italy has been enduring intense cold and heavy snowfalls for days now. Across the country families have been consuming huge amounts of gas in an effort to keep warm.

At the same time, Italy has received less gas imports from Russia than it wanted.

And with more cold weather forecast, the government here described the situation as critical.

So an emergency plan has now been activated. Some power stations will switch from gas, to oil fuel.

And some industrial customers will have their gas supplies cut. The aim is to protect domestic users from shortages.

“I understand the current US price is around 15p per therm for gas, and it is a market which has an oversupply of shale gas, unlike the UK, so perhaps there are lessons to be learned here.”

More than 200 people across Europe have died because of the cold weather.

Ukraine’s government has said that its country’s death toll is at least 130.

“Although UK demand is still well below the record set in 2010, the price increases have to be seen in the context of very high simultaneous demand across all of Europe and Russia,” said Edward Cox of energy experts ICIS Heren.

Supply issues

There have also been concerns in recent days about gas supplies from Russia after state-owned energy firm Gazprom lowered supply for a few days last week.

The European Commission has sought to reassure member states that gas flows from Russia have returned to normal levels in six European countries after recent unprecedented demand.

Supplies are back to normal in Austria, Bulgaria, Greece, Hungary, Poland and Slovakia, said the European Commission’s spokeswoman for energy, Marlene Holzner.

But Italy’s main energy supplier, Eni, will begin shutting off supply to industrial clients with interruptible contracts from Tuesday.

The move, which is used by suppliers as a way of controlling demand, was decided at a meeting of Italy’s gas emergency committee.

Some businesses sign up to interruptible contracts because they offer cheaper supply in return for an agreement that gas can be cut off temporarily without warning.

Fast food chains prosper as cash-strapped consumers shun retailers

US fast food chains Subway and McDonald’s announced plans to open hundreds of new stores creating more than 8,000 jobs

McDonalds London

McDonald’s fast food restaurant in, central London, the US chain has announced store expansion plans in the UK creating 2,500 jobs. Photograph Graham Turner

Mealtimes used to revolve around the kitchen table, but the fast-food boom is changing Britain and its high streets, as US food chains Subway, Starbucks and McDonald’s set out to conquer a recession-weary nation still hungry for instant gratification.

Last week, sandwich chain Subway trumpeted plans to open 600 new stores over the next three years, creating up to 6,000 jobs, while McDonald’s said it would create 2,500 jobs this year through new outlets and 24-hour burger flipping.

Starbucks, with 300 branches and 5,000 jobs said to be in the pipeline over the next five years, is also in the midst of a high street bun fight that is pitting US imports against flourishing domestic chains such as Greggsand Costa Coffee.

With more than 1,400 stores in the UK, Subway is already five times the size it was in 2004, but its founder and self-styled “sandwich king” Fred DeLuca, who was in London to speak at a franchisee conference last week, was bullish: “Everybody eats three times a day; it’s only a question of where they choose to eat. The longer-term trends are that people eat out more often.”

His upbeat attitude is at odds with the gloomy atmosphere among high-street retailers who face painful and costly restructuring to shed stores that are no longer economic as shoppers pull in their horns.

Analysts say firms like Subway and Greggs, which both offer £3 lunch deals, are weathering the storm because they appeal to hard-pressed consumers who are seeking out affordable treats, like burgers and crème brûlée macchiatos, rather than splashing out on new outfits and video games.

DeLuca said like-for-like sales at British Subway stores had jumped 10% over the last three months while the success of doughnut-maker Krispy Kreme in 2011 will see it push north into Scotland this year.

The coalition’s hopes that the private sector will create enough new jobs to soak up the thousands of workers laid off by the public sector has meant that the expansion plans of McDonald’s and co have met with ministerial gushing.

Nick Clegg toured the burger chain’s UK training centre last Wednesday and said the big jobs number – with half the new positions earmarked for the under 25s – was “fantastic news” not least because the unemployment rate, at 8.4%, is at its highest level since 1995, with young people hit hardest.

But like other developed nations, Britain has a well-documented weight problem. Analysts also question whether the economic pain will soon shift to coffee shops and fast-food outlets if the industry – which is shoehorning outlets into stations, hospitals and petrol stations and seeking franchise partners to reach smaller towns and cities – fulfils such high octane expansion plans.

It is not only the service that is fast in the food-on-the-go sector, as research by the Local Data Company (LDC) shows. In the past five years McDonald’s has been overtaken by Subway, only for Greggs, which has 1,500 stores, and in some parts of London two bakeries on the same street, to become the largest chain.

DeLuca says Subway is not at risk of over-expanding: “When we get to 2,000 stores, we’ll have about one store for every 30,000 people (in the UK). That’s actually quite low density for us. In the US we have one store for every 12,000 people.”

There are more than 47,000 takeaway food outlets in the UK, according to LDC, but less than a third are operated by the big brands and given the tough economic backdrop their success is expected to come at the expense of independent bakers and coffee shop owners.

LDC director Matthew Hopkinson questions the need for Greggs and Subway to build huge store networks at a time when others are desperate to shake off costly leases: “I find it difficult to understand how everyone is going to make money from massive expansion. It suggests that no one ever buys food and eats at home and we know from the success of the supermarkets that’s not true.”

Despite the economic downturn, office workers still march to work armed with lattes, while on the domestic front there has been a technological race to create the most seductively shaped (read expensive) coffee machine for kitchen worktops.

Jeffrey Young, managing director of research firm Allegra Strategies, which recently published a report examining the growth of branded coffee chains in the UK, said they had shown “incredible resilience” throughout the financial crisis. The report said sales at the big coffee chains rose 10% to £2.1bn last year with around 11m cups of coffee drunk in, or carried out, each week.

Coffee shops offer Britons a respite from the “feeling of austerity” in the current economy, explains Young: “Coffee shops continue to be important to consumers who visit as part of their desire to socialise and have a regular affordable treat.”

He cautioned, however, that those consumers were already showing signs of cutting back each time they pop in for a pick me up with roughly £3.18 spent per visit last year, compared with £3.50 in 2009.

With more than one in seven high street stores already lying empty, property experts do not expect the rapacious growth of food chains to fill that void. Indeed some food chains could find themselves marooned, as it is estimated that about 50% of the UK’s shop leases will expire over the next seven years, threatening to accelerate the pace of high street change.

“People want to do a bit of window shopping and have a frothy coffee and a sandwich,” adds Hopkinson. Take the window shopping out of the equation, and Britain’s appetite for fast food might be lost rapidly.

US industrial conglomerate General Electric has seen its profits rise, but its shares fell after revenues were lower than expected.

GE shares opened down more than 2% as investors reacted badly to the results for the three months to 31 December.

Fourth-quarter earnings from continuing operations rose 26% to $4.5bn (£2.89bn) but revenue fell 8% to $37.9bn.

GE blamed lower-than-expected revenues on slower-than-expected growth in Europe and currency changes.

Europe downturnContinue reading the main story

General Electric Co.

LAST UPDATED AT 20 JAN 2012, 21:00 GMT*CHART SHOWS LOCAL TIMEGeneral Electric Co. intraday chart

price change %
19.15 -

-0.01
-

-0.05

For the full-year, the picture was similar. Earnings were up to $20.1bn from $14.1bn in 2010, while revenues for the year were down.

Revenues in 2010 were boosted by the sale of GE’s majority stake in broadcaster NBC, which largely accounts for the fall in revenues in 2011.

However, the results for the final three months of the year were still about $2bn below analysts’ expectations.

The company, which manufactures a range of industrial products including jet engines and turbines for power generators from coal plants to wind farms, said it would change its European business in response to the poor economy.

“We expect continued volatility in 2012 and have prepared for it by investing in new products and technology, expanding our growth market footprint and taking important steps to strengthen risk management,” said GE chairman and chief executive Jeff Immelt.

“We are restructuring our businesses in Europe to reflect market conditions,” he added

Does fast food deserve its poor reputation?

Alex James sparked outrage last week when he wrote in praise of fast-food giants in the Sun. Tim Hayward and Jay Rayner debate our relationship with fast food.

Macdonald's Restaurant In London

A McDonald’s Big Mac. Alex James claimed the fast-food chain was in some ways ‘very similar to a Michelin-starred restaurant’. Photograph: Bloomberg via Getty Images

Tim Hayward, food writer and editor of Fire & Knives food quarterly:

Unless you’ve been trapped down a well all week, I assume you’ve seenAlex James’s piece in the Sun. It’s a stonking great opus, in which he’s managed to get himself invited into Greggs‘, McDonald’s and KFC’s factories and concludes that their food is great and an all-round blessing on humanity. At one point – and this is the one that caused Twitter to melt – he avers that McDonald’s is in some ways “very similar to a Michelin-starred restaurant”. I’m finding this frankly fascinating. It’s got the online food community up in arms like nothing else I’ve seen for a long time – there’s a really angry backlash against “one of us” supporting the fast-food companies, particularly in such a powerful medium. Personally, I reckon he’s wrong to the point of being irresponsible to defend fast food in our largest circulation tabloid, but the fact that he is, that the Sun wants to publish it and their readers want to read it indicates that the national conversation about food, from media and government, is catastrophically missing the most important audience.

Horta-Osório, who started in the job less than a year ago, could have claimed a maximum bonus of £2.4m last year, or 225% of his basic salary.

Lloyds Banking Group's chief executive Antonio Horta-Osorio on his first day back at work.

Lloyds Banking Group’s chief executive Antonio Horta-Osorio on his first day back at work. Photograph: Ben Stansall/AFP/Getty Images

Pressure was mounting today on top bankers to waive their multimillion-pound bonuses after António Horta-Osório, the boss of bailed out Lloyds Banking Group, announced he would not take a payout that could have been worth £2.4m.

The Portuguese-born banker put his peers in the spotlight by saying he took the decision because of the “tough financial circumstances of people” as well as the bank’s poor performance and his two month’s absence following a severe bout of insomnia.

After returning to work on Monday, Horta-Osório had discussed the potential bonus with his family before telling the board of the bank, which is 41% owned by the taxpayer, that he did not want to be considered for a payout.

Treasury sources said George Osborne welcomed the decision, while Lord Oakeshott, the Liberal Democrat peer who resigned as a Treasury spokesman a year ago over the government’s soft stance on the banks, urged rivals to follow suit.

The Lloyds board is preparing to discuss bonuses next month. It had made no decision about whether to award Horta-Osório a bonus in light of the 60% fall in the share price and a plunge back into the red after a £3.2bn provision for misselling payment protection insurance.

Horta-Osório’s announcement has turned the focus on bosses of other major banks at a time when the government has been calling for restraint, particularly at the bailed out banks – Lloyds and Royal Bank of Scotland – which are expected to be held to the same restrictions as last year when any bonus above £2,000 had to be paid in shares or bonds and not in cash.

Bonuses for 2011 are yet to be finalised but if they were awarded the maximum, Stephen Hester, chief executive of Royal Bank of Scotland, could get £2.4m, Bob Diamond, chief executive of Barclays, as much as £3.4m and Stuart Gulliver, chief executive of HSBC, up to £4.8m.

Horta-Osório had faced questions about his entitlement to a bonus for 2011 after two months off to recover from “fatigue” following a period last year when he could not sleep for five consecutive days. He checked himself into the Priory to recuperate and pledged to change his intense management style when he returned to work on Monday – defying sceptics who had reckoned his career was in tatters.

“As chief executive, I believe my bonus entitlement should reflect the performance of the group but also the tough financial circumstances that many people are facing. I also acknowledge that my leave of absence has had an impact both inside and outside the bank including for shareholders. On that basis, I have decided to request that the board does not consider me for a 2011 bonus,” he said.

Oakeshott has put pressure not to take bonuses on the bosses of RBS and Barclays – including two bankers at Barclays, Jerry del Missier and Rich Ricci who a year ago were handed more than £40m each after share deals awarded over the previous five years came to fruition.

“Rejoice. A responsible banker at long last is starting to recognise his customers’ pain. It would be unthinkable after this for George Osborne to pay Stephen Hester even a penny bonus at our other state-owned bank. And Bob Diamond’s £40m gang of three running Barclays should follow the Horta-Osório example,” said Oakeshott.

Horta-Osório was lured from Spanish bank Santander a year ago with a package of up to £13.4m and in deciding to waive any bonus is still likely to receive millions of pounds as he receives a salary of £1m and other elements from his complex signing-on package.

Lloyds is in the process of trying to claw back a £1.9m bonus handed to Horta-Osorio’s predecessor Eric Daniels before the bank took the £3.2bn hit for misselling and is braced for a row over the signing on fee for new finance director George Culmer who might be handed as much as £4.5m to buy him out of deals at his current employer, the insurer RSA.

Charles Stewart Rolls, who co-founded the company with Henry Royce in 1904, sits in the back seat of a 20-horsepower Rolls Royce, during the 1905 TT (Tourist Trophy) race. London (CNN) — During the 1970s, Britain’s car industry was the sick man of Europe: many models were poorly designed and built, politicians and the nationalized company management lacked strategic vision while workers were often on strike.
Four decades on, that perception has been turned on its head. Despite the closure of the last British-owned volume car maker, Rover, in 2005, the country is now building near-record numbers of vehicles while the proportion of cars exported is the highest ever.
Belying the moribund state of the global economy, sales of luxury models are now leading the charge. On Monday Rolls-Royce posted its best results in its 107-year-history with 3,538 cars — which cost upwards of £200,000 ($308,000) — sold in 2011, a 31% rise over the previous year’s figure. This growth is powered by surging demand in Asia: China now joins the United States as the BMW-owned marque’s most significant markets.
Look at images of historic Rolls-Royce
“We had an outstanding year in 2011 and we should take a moment to reflect on this Great British success story,” said the company’s CEO Torsten Muller-Otvos. Rolls-Royce spokesman Andrew Ball told CNN the company was profitable but declined to detail any figures.
The booming Rolls-Royce sales figures come days after its former sister company, Bentley, posted a 37% rise in global sales, also on the back of rising sales to China and the U.S. The Volkswagen-owned company, based in Crewe, in northern England, in 2011 sold more than 7,000 cars, the prices of which start at £133,000 ($208,000).
The rise in output comes on the back of a huge rise in productivity. In the 1970s, 545,000 people were employed in Britain’s car factories, making 15 million cars during that decade. Between 2001 and 2011 there were only 133,000 workers in the industry, but they produced 16.1 million cars.
Toyota has recently created 1,500 jobs at its plant in Derbyshire in a £100 million investment while Jaguar Land Rover said it would double the size of its factory on Merseyside providing 1,000 new jobs.
The Ghost car is proving successful because it is a bit more affordable and less ostentatious than the Phantom.
Motoring journalist Iain Reid
The success of British car makers is echoed by U.S. car makers which are expected to report their first profits since 2004. Most analysts are forecasting better industrywide sales in 2012 and beyond. They see sales rising from 12.8 million in 2011 to between 13.5 million to 14 million this year and close to 15 million by 2014 or 2015.
Detroit automakers are finally making profits
Rolls-Royce’s sales figures are the best since 1978 when the company sold 3,347 cars, mainly of the Silver Shadow II model. The latest Rolls-Royce models share many components with BMW models, such as the 7-series, but cost more than twice as much.
Motoring journalist Iain Reid of What Car? magazine said part of the reason behind R-R’s success lay in its product range. “If you make the right models people will buy them. The Ghost car is proving successful because it is a bit more affordable and less ostentatious than the Phantom.”
The Rolls-Royce brand was doing well, he said, because it married British heritage with BMW’s sales and marketing expertise. Reid added that companies such as Nissan, BMW Mini and Honda had good plants in the UK that were building desirable cars. “You can’t go wrong with that mix,” Reid told CNN.
Industry analyst Paul Nieuwenhuis said that while many customers bought luxury cars “by the meter” — that is to say they care more about the image than the machine — modern Rolls-Royce cars were exceptional vehicles. “They are surprisingly agile, and don’t feel nearly as big as they actually are. And their attention to detail is unrivaled.”
Nieuwenhuis, director of the Centre for Automotive Industry Research at Cardiff Business School, said Britain had a global reputation for building luxury cars. “This is something that we are doing well, despite our own car market doing badly.” He added that the Rolls-Royce sales figures showed that “rich people still have money” especially in China.
The rights to use the Rolls-Royce name have been owned by BMW since 1998 when Vickers sold off Rolls-Royce Motors, which also made Bentley cars. Volkswagen paid £430 million for the existing factory in Crewe but did not secure the rights to use the Rolls-Royce name on their vehicles. This was bought from Rolls-Royce plc, which continues to make aero engines, for £40 million by BMW, which built a new plant in Goodwood, West Sussex, in southern England.

IEA’s gloomy outlook rejected by Opec, which says there are downward pressures on the cost of crude oil

Germany - Business - Recycled Oil Barrels

International energy agency is expecting demand for energy to grow by a third between 2010 and 2035. Photograph Kay Nietfeld/dpa/Corbis

The world’s leading energy thinktank has warned that oil prices could spiral above $150 (£93) a barrel in the short term if political unrest in Africa and the Middle East leads to inadequate investment over the coming years.

Despite a drop in the cost of crude on 9 November prompted by the deepening crisis in the eurozone, the Paris-based International Energy Agency, said the high cost of crude posed a threat to the global economy and said there was a risk of prices exceeding the previous peak of $147 a barrel seen in 2008.

“In 2011, $102 is the average price through to today which means the global economic recovery is at risk. We are in the danger zone for the global economy at current levels,” IEA economist Fatih Birol told a news conference.

“There is a possibility that production growth from the Middle East and North Africa (Mena) region may not be what the consumers would like to see. This would be a pity for the global economy, a pity for the oil sector and a pity for those governments.”

Birol’s comment followed the release of the IEA’s annual World Energy Outlook, which said that if investment in the Mena region runs one-third lower than the $100bn a year required between 2011-2015, consumers could face a near-term rise in the oil price to $150 a barrel. The thinktank is expecting demand for energy to grow by a third between 2010 and 2035, with two thirds of the increase coming from the fast-growing emerging countries, and says enormous investment in exploration, drilling and refining will be needed for supply to keep pace.

Fears that the outlook for global growth will be affected by Europe’s sovereign debt problems prompted oil prices to fall by $2 a barrel as dealers anticipated weaker demand. Analysts said the fall would have been larger had it not been for the ratcheting up of international pressure against Iran over its nuclear programme. A barrel of Brent crude was changing hands for little more than $113 a barrel in the global commodity markets.

“People are scared that Italy’s too big to bail out,” said Michael Hewson, analyst at CMC Markets. “It’s driving people out of risky assets and it’s reinforcing fears about a double-dip recession, which will hit demand-sensitive assets like oil.”

The IEA’s gloomy assessment of the outlook for the price of oil was rejected by the 12-nation oil cartel, Opec, which said that there were downward pressures on the cost of crude. Opec has signalled that it sees no need to announce a boost to oil supplies at its meeting next month, despite calls from developed nations in the west for lower prices.

Opec, which produces every third barrel in the world and has faced unprecedented unrest across its members this year, said in its monthly report on Wednesday it was not overly concerned by under-investment by its member countries in light of current oil prices and large increases in public spending.

“It is expected that economic growth in 2012 in the Mena region will be stronger than in 2011, mainly due to the massive infrastructure and industrial developments in Saudi Arabia, and robust growth in Iraq,” it said.

The IEA also said time was running short for governments to meet their goal of limiting the temperature rise to 2C.

“If, as of 2017, there is not the start of major and clean new investments, the door to 2C will be closed,” Birol said.

“There is a need for an international legally binding agreement to put a price on carbon, to put in place some new regulations … If we look at the current state of climate talks and … the financial crisis, it is difficult to say the wind is blowing in the right direction,” he added

Before the tsunami, Japan was already battling years of stagnation. Now some say it could happen here too.

A worker checks Yaris cars in a factory in Ohira

A worker checks Yaris cars in a factory in Ohira. Toyota fears the effect of European finance drying up.  Photograph: Koji Sasahara/AP

The pulsating kaleidoscope of colour that turns stultifying Tokyo days into neon-lit nights means that, after dark at least, it looks like nothing has changed in one of the most exciting cities in the world.

No pace has been lost in the frenetic morning commute either, as office workers battle through the capital’s sweaty streets to get to their desks on time. The differences are more subtle than that. At the end of their journey they are not greeted with a welcome blast of cold air: offices are dim and clammy as companies economise on lighting and air conditioning following power shortages triggered by the Fukushima crisis.

Japan‘s physical recovery from the devastation wrought by the huge earthquake and tsunami in March appears to have been swift outside the worst-hit zones. For the economy, however, emerging from the barren years dubbed the “lost decade” is a slower, more painful process.

Talk of a similar era for Europe might be seen as economic scaremongering but the warning should perhaps be taken seriously when it comes from business leaders in a country that has endured the phenomenon.

Yukitoshi Funo, a senior executive at Toyota, one of Japan’s largest firms, says the country has been in the doldrums since the 1990s and that Europe now faces its own decade of financial inertia as world leaders scramble for a solution to the eurozone crisis. “I am not sure if it is a lost 10 or lost 20 years – but it is about to happen on a global scale, and that is a very big problem,” he says.

Despite the sweltering heat outside the car firm’s Toyota City HQ, Funo cuts a temperate, bookish figure and hardly seems the type to press the panic button without consideration. But he fears that Europe, and perhaps the world economy, is about to enter the wilderness years.

The so-called lost decade was triggered by racy property lending in the 1980s that saw, in an oft-repeated anecdote, the grounds of the Imperial Palace in Tokyo valued at more than all the real estate in California. The Japanese government tried numerous emergency measures including boosting public spending and quantitative easing, but these measures were considered too little too late, and at one point their effect was cut short by an ill-timed rise in VAT. Ever since, Japan has drifted, dipping in and out of recession. Ring any bells?

At one of Toyota’s closest rivals, Nissan, Andy Palmer, executive vice-president and the company’s most senior-ranking Briton in the company, says European countries ought to pay close attention to the lessons learned by Japan. He advocates the harsh medicine dished out by the UK government and laments the “complacency” and near-bankruptcy that afflicted his company until it formed a life-saving alliance with France’s Renault in 1999. “The lesson is: do what you know needs to be done, whether you are a British company, the British government or a European government,” he says.

“When you are in debt, you stop spending,” Palmer adds. “I am watching the UK with some admiration because there seems to be the will to take action on austerity, despite opposition. As a company, it’s the same. When the chips are down, you cut the cloth to fit your means. The companies that recognise the business model has changed are the ones that will come through the chaos.”

In cities such as Tokuyama, Yokohama, Nagoya and Tokyo there is scant evidence of the economic wasteland that “lost decade” implies. In Japanese boardrooms, however, there is a sense of resignation about the home market, coupled with an unsentimental attitude about the action required: look elsewhere.

Japan accounts for just 16% of sales at the construction and mining machinery firm Komatsu, with China now the company’s biggest customer. “Komatsu does not generate any business domestically. We gain from exports,” says its chairman, Masahiro Sakane, who believes Japan needs to cut deficit spending and boost the role of women in the economy.

“If we take advantage of this potential then we can achieve a new, reborn Japan. If we just take the model of spending on public works here and there, then all that large amount of investment may be wasted. Our [financial] burden will be a very heavy burden again. Japan is at a very critical turning point.”

While Japan wrestles with how to revive its domestic economy, exports continue to fill the gap. At Hitachi’s train factory in Tokuyama, workers are waiting to build the prototypes for the carriages that will replace the British Intercity 125s. In Yokohama, Nissan’s headquarters give pride of place to the Leaf electric car, which will be built at overseas sites including the Nissan factory in Sunderland, and in Toyota City Funo explains that Japan is only one of “six wheels” now driving the business.

If this means Britain should battle through a looming lost decade by replicating Japan’s strengths in manufacturing, known as monozukuri, then there are pitfalls too. The phrase cho-endaka, or super-strong yen, is being uttered a lot by Japanese executives because, at about ¥76 to the dollar, it sends costs through the roof as well as making exports too expensive. The government is reportedly preparing to spend ¥4tn (£33bn) on capping the currency’s rise. While the British business secretary, Vince Cable, bemoans an unbalanced UK economy that lacks sufficient manufacturing heft, it could be argued that Japan has the same problem – except that it is industry that is tipping the scales too far.

For Japan, this macroeconomic quandary is being debated as the government battles to reconstruct Tohoku, the north-east region devastated by the earthquake, tsunami and nuclear disaster.

A two-hour train ride north of Tokyo, the Renesas Electronics plant is running normally after a huge effort restored a site that had been reduced to rubble by the shocks which left it unable to produce the microcontroller chips that are crucial to Japan’s motor industry.

Renesas’s Shuichi Inoue admits car firms may buy their products elsewhere, perhaps abroad. “That risk is always there. We don’t want that to happen but, from a customer’s point of view, of course they will want to think about that.”

Concerns about manufacturing disappearing or moving abroad are a familiar refrain in the UK and some economists think Japan could do with exporting less and consuming more anyway. Jeegar Kakkad, former senior economist at the UK manufacturers’ association the EEF, says: “Although the tsunami proved devastating for Japan, the country should use it as a fillip to build better-balanced foundations for their economy.”

At next month’s G20 summit in Cannes, much of the focus will be on Nicolas Sarkozy and Angela Merkel. But everyone should heed the painfully earned wisdom of the Japanese delegation. “A landing should happen,” says Funo. “The question is whether it is going to be a soft landing or a hard landing. It is an unknown.” He says European banks are retreating from lending already: “My view is this contraction is already happening.”

He adds that emerging economies have helped Toyota continue to grow despite the US downturn., but that could be endangered by the eurozone crisis. “European finance was fuelling the emerging economies; it played a significant role. So therefore when European finance contracts, that is a problem. It is already heading towards that direction. It is fate.”

Chancellor backs move to boost the IMF’s bailout fund, provided a deal to stabilise the eurozone can be reached

George Osborne at G20 summit

George Osborne arriving at the Paris summit of G20 ministers. Photograph: Michel Euler/AP

British taxpayers may have to find more cash to prop up the ailing euro after George Osborne backed a move to increase the size of the global bailout fund to rescue indebted European countries.

The chancellor, speaking at the G20 summit in Paris, said he was willing to consider a plan to increase the International Monetary Fund’s firepower, provided a rescue deal had been agreed that would bring the two-year sovereign debt crisis to an end. Pumping more money into the Washington-based lender was “no substitute”, he said, for European leaders hammering out the package of financial measures required to restore stability in the eurozone.

Osborne’s qualified support for the creation of a larger global safety net could see the UK commit further loans to the IMF, though officials said a comprehensive rescue deal would make extra demands unlikely. His remarks were designed to support moves by G20 finance ministers to arrive at a definitive solution to the crisis while appeasing rightwing Tory MPs who have voiced concerns about extending further loans to the eurozone.

His comments came as European leaders continued to wrangle over the size and shape of the fund required to bail out Greece and prevent Italy and Spain from collapse. The make-or-break moment could come at a summit of EU leaders next Sunday (23 October) when Germany and France have promised to set out a plan that would stop the debt crisis spreading to other countries, protect Europe’s embattled banks and prevent the global economy from tipping back into recession.

German chancellor Angela Merkel has refused to be drawn on whether the package will amount to the “big bazooka” demanded by financial markets. Last week she played down speculation that the €440bn European financial stability facility (EFSF) agreed by all eurozone countries would be expanded to nearer €2 trillion. The EFSF has the resources to cope with bailouts for Greece, Portugal and Ireland, but unless enlarged would be overwhelmed by the need to rescue a bigger economy such as Italy or Spain.

Osborne said the Paris talks had made clear the urgency with which eurozone leaders needed to agree measures to shore up their banks, bolster the EFSF, and develop a sustainable solution for Greece – code for allowing Athens to default on at least half of its loans.

“[The crisis] remains the epicentre of the world’s current economic problems,” he said. “The European council is clearly the moment when people are expecting something quite impressive.”

It is understood detailed discussions over the focus of the EFSF and how to expand its remit are likely to continue up until the Cannes summit of world leaders in November. Several eurozone countries are wary of expanding the fund, fearful that it will provide a green light to Italy and Spain to relax their debt repayment plans.

Holland, Finland and Austria are allied with Germany in calling for private investors, including large European banks and US investment funds, to take bigger losses on their loans to Greece as part of an overall rescue package. Investors have so far rejected plans to increase an agreed loss of 21% to nearer 40%, saying Greece remains on track to cut its debts and ease the burden on its main creditor, the European Central Bank.

Concern that 20 or 30 European banks would be forced to seek extra capital, probably from taxpayers, has alarmed Brussels, increasing the urgency to find a way to protect sovereign debts without wrecking bank balance sheets.

The G20 delayed a decision on boosting the IMF’s current bailout fund, which could be doubled in size, though the IMF’s dominant shareholders, including the US, Japan, Germany and China, are content with its £270bn of resources.

US treasury secretary Timothy Geithner said that, like the UK, Canada and Australia, the US was open to discussions about a larger IMF fund, but that most of its resources remained available. “They [the IMF] have very substantial resources that are uncommitted,” he said.

- The Guardian

The Bank of England has taken action to kickstart Britain’s flatlined economy by pumping another £75bn into the banking system, more than economists had expected.

Faced with growing warnings of a double-dip recession and a eurozone crisis, the Bank is setting aside fears about high inflation to increase its programme of quantitative easing (QE).

Explaining the move, Bank governor Sir Mervyn King said that the current financial crisis was “the most serious financial crisis at least since the 1930s if not ever.”

“We’re creating money because there’s not enough money in the economy,” King told Sky News. “We’re having to deal with very unusual circumstances but react calmly to this and do the right thing.”

King denied that the move would damage the UK economy by fuelling inflation, claiming that the rising cost of living would fall back sharply next year. He insisted that it was right to inject more money in the UK economic system by creating another £75bn of electronic money for asset purchases.

“There isn’t enough money in our economy. This is very unusual but it’s happening. It happened in the 1930s and it’s happening now,” he said.

The Bank cited slower economic growth at home and abroad, especially in the UK’s main export markets, as well as problems in the eurozone, and strains on the banking system.

“These tensions in the world economy threaten the UK recovery,” it said in a statement.

“The squeeze on households’ real incomes and the fiscal consolidation are likely to continue to weigh on domestic spending, while the strains in bank funding markets may also inhibit the availability of credit to consumers and businesses.”

It argued that high inflation was mainly down to factors that would likely subside, such as higher energy prices.

Markets rally

The Bank’s bid to shore up the economy boosted confidence in financial markets, with the FTSE 100 closing 189 points higher at 5291. However the pound weakened to a 14-month low of $1.528 at the prospect of more money being printed.

The TUC’s general secretary, Brendan Barber, said the decision to expand QE was the right one, but added: “While it is better than not doing anything, quantitative easing is no economic magic wand. We worry that it does more to help the finance sector than the rest of the economy and could fuel further inflation at a time when living standards are already being squeezed.”

Business leaders welcomed the move.

Graeme Leach, chief economist at the Institute of Directors, said: “Near zero GDP and money supply growth made a compelling case and the Bank of England was right to launch QE2. It could be argued that the Bank of England was slow to introduce QE the first time, but thankfully it hasn’t made the same mistake twice.”

Most economists had expected the monetary policy committee (MPC) to delay a decision on more QE until next month when it will have its newest forecasts for growth and inflation. But market players had said the decision would be very finely balanced given the latest downbeat economic data, including news this week that the economy virtually ground to a halt in the second quarter.

MPC members themselves had also indicated they could act sooner rather than later if there were fresh signs of growth tailing off. The Bank also left interest rates on hold at their record low of 0.5%.

The latest move raises QE programme to £275bn. QE effectively puts money into the markets through asset purchases, mainly of UK government bonds, made by the Bank of England. Between March 2009 and January 2010 it bought £200bn of assets, equivalent to about 14% of GDP to help breathe life into the UK economy following the credit crunch.

While the Thursday’s move was broadly welcomed by businesses, the CBI lobby group warned there were more threats to an already stalling economy.

“This measure will help support confidence, but we need to recognise that its impact on near term growth prospects is likely to be relatively modest. Only once the turmoil in the eurozone is resolved will confidence be fully restored,” said its chief economic adviser Ian McCafferty.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.